Categories

Ratomir Milikić, PhD
Institute for Contemporary History, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

 

THE FATE OF MAJOR ATHERTON AND THE ALLIED HYDRA MISSION IN 1942: BETWEEN YUGOSLAV LITERATURE AND BRITISH SOURCES

Vol. XLIII, 1/2025, pp. 125-146
https://doi.org/10.29362/ist20veka.2025.1.mil.125-146

 

ABSTRACT/RESUME:

Experts, as well as a bro­a­der pu­blic, ha­ve mos­tly en­dor­sed a de­ca­des-old stereotype that the ill-fa­ted Hydra mis­si­on, which the Al­li­es car­ri­ed out in oc­cu­pi­ed Yugo­sla­via un­der Ma­jor Te­ren­ce At­her­ton, was cur­sed by the gre­edy hand of a “Chet­nik vil­la­in” thirsty for En­glish blo­od and a go­od amo­unt of gold. Ba­sed on do­cu­ments from Bri­tish so­ur­ces, this pa­per is pro­vi­ding a new an­gle. The Hydra mis­si­on, a mixed Bri­tish-Yugo­slav ven­tu­re that must be viewed as an insepa­ra­ble part of a jo­int un­der­ta­king with the Yugo­slav He­na mis­si­on, too, was led by Ma­jor Te­ren­ce At­her­ton, well-acqua­in­ted with Yugo­slav cir­cum­stan­ces and re­cru­i­ted du­ring the war. It was in a pe­cu­li­ar way that the mis­si­on re­ac­hed oc­cu­pi­ed Yugo­sla­via in Ja­nu­ary 1942, right af­ter the Upri­sing had be­en crus­hed and a ci­vil war erup­ted between two re­si­stan­ce mo­ve­ments in the co­untry – on­bo­ard a sub­ma­ri­ne, the Hydra te­am lan­ded on the Mon­te­ne­grin co­ast, ne­ar Pe­ra­zi­ća Do. Alt­ho­ugh not all the de­ta­ils of Ma­jor At­her­ton’s in­struc­ti­on ha­ve be­en re­ve­a­led, the most re­a­so­na­ble as­sump­ti­on is that he was sup­po­sed to esta­blish com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on with Ge­ne­ral Mi­ha­i­lo­vić and pro­vi­de a ge­nu­i­ne pic­tu­re of the si­tu­a­ti­on in the oc­cu­pi­ed co­untry for the purposes of the Spe­ci­al Ope­ra­ti­ons Execu­ti­ve (SOE) and the Bri­tish aut­ho­ri­ti­es. Shortly af­ter they had re­ac­hed the Yugo­slav so­il, mem­bers of the Mis­si­on were in­ter­ned by a Pe­o­ple’s Libera­ti­on Mo­ve­ment (NOP) unit. The com­man­ding of­fi­cer did not trust the fo­re­ig­ners introducing them­sel­ves as al­li­es, pre­fer­ring to liqui­da­te them, but the or­ders ar­ri­ved to escort them un­der gu­ard to Ti­to in Fo­ča, whe­re the NOP he­adquar­ters was at that ti­me. Se­e­mingly a free man, but in fact un­der con­stant, strict sur­ve­il­lan­ce by his Par­ti­san escort, At­her­ton was able to me­et and talk with the most pro­mi­nent le­a­ders of the Par­ti­san mo­ve­ment. Ti­to tri­ed to sum­ma­ri­ze the si­tu­a­ti­on in the co­untry and wit­hin the re­si­stan­ce mo­ve­ment as a tre­ac­he­ro­us cru­sa­de by the then do­mi­nant Yugo­slav Army in the Ho­me­land (JVuO) aga­inst the NOP. Ti­to would of­fer va­ri­o­us pi­e­ces of in­for­ma­ti­on as evi­den­ce of his cla­ims, but did not al­low At­her­ton any spon­ta­ne­o­us con­tact with the sur­ro­un­dings, not even with or­di­nary NOP figh­ters. Whi­le in Fo­ča, At­her­ton met Royal Yugo­slav Army Ge­ne­ral Lju­bo No­va­ko­vić, who at that ti­me had ma­de a sort of pact with the NOP. The two esca­ped from Fo­ča and the Par­ti­sans to­get­her, and ac­cor­ding to Bri­tish so­ur­ces, Ti­to sent Slo­bo­dan Pe­ne­zić Kr­cun af­ter them, to “catch them at all costs.” Kr­cun, run­ning the ker­nel of the De­part­ment for the Pro­tec­ti­on of the Pe­o­ple at the ti­me, set out to ac­com­plish the task. In this cha­se, Ma­jor At­her­ton va­nis­hed, as did the gold he was carrying. Ge­ne­ral Mihai­lo­vić or­de­red an ur­gent in­ve­sti­ga­ti­on right away, but as the war was ne­a­ring its end, Ti­to claimed in his con­tacts with the Bri­tish that he, too, had con­duc­ted an in­ve­sti­ga­ti­on. The Partisan le­a­der in­si­sted that so­me of the JVuO units on the gro­und had liqui­da­ted the Bri­tish ma­jor. This ver­si­on, con­coc­ted by Ti­to and the NOP, has be­en gra­du­ally bu­ilt up, expan­ded, and ela­bo­ra­ted over ti­me. In 1943 Ti­to was expli­cit that he had not­hing to do with At­her­ton’s di­sap­pe­a­ran­ce, and at the end of 1944 he was al­re­ady per­su­a­ding the Bri­tish si­de that the JVuO sol­di­ers were to be bla­med. In the fol­lowing years and de­ca­des, even a pre­su­med per­pe­tra­tor was iden­ti­fi­ed. The nar­ra­ti­ve pe­a­ked in the 1980s, when unexpec­ted wit­nes­ses to At­her­ton’s esca­pe from Fo­ča were fo­und, re­mem­be­ring everything per­fectly and ea­ger to spe­ak up ne­arly fo­ur de­ca­des af­ter the tra­gic events. On the ot­her hand, the Bri­tish tri­ed to iden­tify tho­se re­spon­si­ble for Ma­jor At­her­ton’s de­ath. In­ter­nal SOE do­cu­ments from the im­me­di­a­te post-war pe­ri­od sug­gest that the Par­ti­sans were the li­ke­li­est cul­prits, with a no­te tho­ugh that in­si­sting on it would be inop­por­tu­ne, as it might thre­a­ten the bi­la­te­ral re­la­ti­ons­hip that be­gan to im­pro­ve af­ter 1948. Be­si­des, an analysis of Bri­tish do­cu­ments re­ve­als that se­ve­ral Bri­tish of­fi­cers with the NOP were kil­led or went mis­sing in a man­ner very si­mi­lar to how At­her­ton di­sap­pe­a­red.

 

KEYWORDS: At­her­ton, Hydra mis­si­on, SOE, Mi­ha­i­lo­vić, Par­ti­san mo­ve­ment, Ti­to, Yugoslavia

 

REFERENCES:

  • Bjelajac, Mile. Generali i admirali Kraljevine Jugoslavije 1918–1941. Beograd: INIS, 2004.
  • Dedijer, Vladimir. Dnevnik, I. Beograd: Jugoslovenska knjiga, 1955.
  • Dikin, F. V. D. Bojovna planina. Beograd: Nolit, 1973.
  • Dornik Šubelj, Ljuba. „Novi podatki o misiji Clowder“. Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino, br. 2 (2022), 128–154.
  • Latas Branko, i Milovan Dželebdžić. Četnički pokret Draže Mihailovića 1941–1945. Beograd: BIGZ, 1979.
  • Mackenzie, William. The Secret History of S. O. E. London: St Ermin’s Press, 2000.
  • Marjanović, Jovan. Draža Mihailović – između Britanaca i Nemaca. Zagreb–Beograd: Globus–Narodna knjiga–Prosveta, 1979.
  • Milikić, Ratomir. „Evakuacija britanskog poslanstva u Kraljevini Jugoslaviji iz Boke Kotorske u aprilu 1941. godine“. Istorija 20. veka, br. 1 (2023), 83–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29362/ist20veka.2023.1.mil.83-98
  • Milikić, Ratomir. „Prilozi za proučavanje srpsko-poljskih odnosa u Drugom svetskom ratu kroz memoarsku građu na srpskom jeziku“. Jugoslavija i Poljska: veze i međusobni odnosi u XX veku. Urednici: Bojan Dimitrijević, Andrej Zaćmiński i Nebojša Stambolija, 193–214. Beograd–Bidgošć: Institut za savremenu istoriju–Istorijski fakultet Univerziteta Kazimira Velikog 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29362/2022.2619.mil.193-214
  • Nikolić, Kosta. Saveznici i pokreti otpora u Jugoslaviji (1941–1945). Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike, 2009.
  • Pavlović, Momčilo. „Očevidac građanskog rata u Srbiji: Elsfort Kramer, poručnik, član Američke misije ’Rendžer’ u Srbiji pod pukovnikom Mekdauelom“. Istorija 20. veka, br. 1 (2007), 167–184.
  • Pavlović, Stevan K. „Misija Stanislava Rapoteca u Jugoslaviji 1941–1942“. Jugoslovenski istorijski časopis, br. 2, (1997).
  • Plećaš, Neđeljko. Ratne godine. Beograd: ISI, 2004.
  • Plenča, Dušan, Međunarodni odnosi Jugoslavije u toku Drugog svjetskog rata. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka, 1962.
  • Tomasevich, Jozo. Četnici u drugom svjetskom ratu: 1941–1945. Zagreb: Liber, 1979.
  • Velebit, Vladimir. Sećanja. Zagreb: Globus, 1983.
  • Vilijams, Heder. Padobranci, patrioti i partizani. Beograd: Nolit, 2009.