Categories

Slobodan Selinić, PhD
Institute for Recent History of Serbia
Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

 

SERBIA AND POLITICAL RELATIONS IN YUGOSLAVIA DURING THE FUNERAL OF ALEKSANDAR RANKOVIĆ 1983: POINTS OF CONFLICT

Vol. XXXIX, 2/2021, pp. 415–434
https://doi.org/10.29362/ist20veka.2021.2.sel.415-434

 

ABSTRACT/RESUME:

Serbia’s political status after the death of Josip Broz was determined by two kinds of efforts by the state. Firstly, the Serbian leaders aimed to change its unequal status in federal Yugoslavia. Secondly, they aimed to stop fragmentation within Serbia, which grew steadily after the 1974 Constitution. Political relations between Serbian leaders on the one hand, and some political circles and leaders of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, and the autonomous provinces on the other, were strained. They worsened even more after several clashes in 1983. Despite the opposition of politicians in Bosnia, Croatia, and Vojvodina to Dragoslav Marković (who was described as a strong advocate of Serbian political unity), he was elected as chairman of the Central Committee of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia (CK SKJ) in 1983. Serbo-Croatian relationships were further damaged after the publication of the book Enigma Kopinič in Belgrade. The Croatian leaders were against this publication because it revealed – as far as the Party was concerned – undesirable information about the interwar years and the period during World War II. The major confrontation came over the interpretation of events that occurred at the funeral of Aleksandar Ranković (mainly over who was responsible for the mass gathering and the respectful attitude toward the deceased). Federal party units, as well as those from the Yugoslav republics and from Belgrade, jointly condemned those events as a political rally against the government. However, they disagreed over who was responsible for the incident and what had caused the public outcry. The CK SKJ chairmanship members from the autonomous provinces, Croatia, and Bosnia accused Serbia and the Serbian Communist Party for the display of nationalism. They also held the Belgrade City Party Committee responsible for letting the rally happen. Contrary to this, the Belgrade City Committee led by Ivan Stambolić, whom the Serbian leadership supported, felt that the uproar was caused by the overall political, economic, and social crisis, for which the Federal government was to blame.

 

KEYWORDS: Serbia, Yugoslavia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Politics, Aleksandar Ranković, Ivan Stambolić, League of Communists of Yugoslavia

 

REFERENCES:

  • Bela knjiga – 1984. Obračun sa „kulturnom kontrarevolucijom“ u SFRJ. Priredili Kosta Nikolić, Srđan Cvetković, Đoko Tripković. Beograd: Službeni glasnik, 2010.
  • Bjelajac, Mile. „Proizvođenje novih nacija, novih manjina i teritorijalna pitanja. (Koncept konkurentske države na tlu Srbije)“. The Shared History. Nations, States and Diasporas of the Former Yugoslavia (Nacije, države i dijaspora na prostoru bivše Jugoslavije). Urednik Darko Gavrilović, 121–142. Sremska Kamenica: Institute for Historical Justice and Reconciliation, Fakultet za evropske pravno-političke studije, 2010.
  • Bjelica, Slobodan. “Views of Vojvodinian Leadership on Re-opening the Issue of the Relationship between SR Serbia and SAP Vojvodina in 1981”. Istraživanja, 27, (2016), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.19090/i.2016.27.258-273
  • Bjelica, Slobodan. „Vojvođanska autonomija – krizno žarište socijalističke Jugoslavije“. Kultura polisa, posebno izdanje Vojvodina kao potencijalno geopolitičko žarište u Republici Srbiji. Priredili Ljubiša Despotović i Goran Ivančević, 273–280. Novi Sad: Kultura – Polis, Institut za evropske studije, 2018.
  • Cenčić, Venceslav. Enigma Kopinič. Beograd: Rad,
  • Čkrebić, Dušan. Između pamćenja i zaborava. Memoarski i politički eseji. Novi Sad: Prometej, 2007.
  • Čkrebić, Dušan. Pogled iskosa. Beograd: Službeni glasnik, 2009.
  • Dimitrijević, Bojan. Ranković, drugi čovek. Beograd: Vukotić media, 2020.
  • Dimić, Ljubodrag. Istorija srpske državnosti, III, Srbija u Jugoslaviji. Novi Sad: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti (ogranak u Novom Sadu), „Beseda“, izdavačka ustanova pravoslavne eparhije Bačke i Društvo istoričara južnobačkog i sremskog okruga, 2011.
  • Đekić, Mirko. Upotreba Srbije. Optužbe i priznanja Draže Markovića. Beograd: Beseda, 1990.
  • Đokić, Bojan. „Srpska javnost o međunacionalnim odnosima u Socijalističkoj autonomnoj pokrajini Kosovo 1981–1989“. Doktorska disertacija. Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za istoriju, 2019.
  • Đukić, Slavoljub. Kako se dogodio vođa. Borba za vlast u Srbiji posle Josipa Broza. Beograd: „Filip Višnjić“, 1992.
  • Jović, Dejan. Jugoslavija – država koja je odumrla. Uspon, kriza i pad Četvrte Jugoslavije (1974.–1990.). Zagreb: Prometej, Beograd: Samizdat B92, 2003.
  • Nikolić, Kosta. „Kako je Slobodan Milošević izabran za vođu srpskih komunista“. Istorija 20. veka, br. 1, (2006), 9–26.
  • Nikolić, Kosta. „Kako je Slobodan Milošević izabran za vođu srpskih komunista (II)“. Istorija 20. veka, 2, (2006), 105–122.
  • Petranović, Branko. Istorija Jugoslavije 1918–1988, III. Beograd: Nolit, 1988.
  • Piljak, Milan. „Brionski plenum 1966. godine. Pokušaj istoriografskog tumačenja događaja“. Tokovi istorije, br. 1, (2010), 72–95.
  • Ristanović, Petar. Kosovsko pitanje 1974–1989. Novi Sad: Prometej, Beograd: Informatika, 2019.
  • Selinić, Slobodan. „Formiranje albanske vlasti u Bujanovcu – pogled unazad“. Novi standard, 26. oktobar 2020: https://www.standard.rs/2020/10/26/formiranje-albanske-vlasti-u-bujanovcu-pogled-unazad/