Vol. XXXVIII, 2/2020, pp. 103–128
https://doi.org/10.29362/ist20veka.2020.2.ris.103-128
ABSTRACT/RESUME:
The intention of the occupation forces to close off the occupied territory to the flow of information that would prevent the citizens of Belgrade from being informed using other channels, experienced failure. The citizens of this city listened intensely to forbidden radio stations and transmitted information by word of mouth. Occupiers, collaborators, allies, resistance movements, and crimes in the NDH were dominant themes in Belgrade’s illegal discourse. The emergence of national poets writing poems with a political connotation was entirely in accordance with the tradition of the Serbian people. We can see clearly that Belgrade restaurants, in this period, also served as a kind of news agency, where one could get all kinds of information or listen to banned songs. Markets, streets, and other places of gathering, where informal conversations were held, were sources where Belgrade citizens could get in touch with forbidden information. Individual examples of violations of a verbal delict, such as Aleksandar Ignjatović, a watchmaker and Leontina Kraus, a teacher, show that there were people among citizens who were not afraid of the repressive measures and threats by the occupation forces and who risked and lost their lives to defend the dignity of the occupied Serbian population.
From the very first day, the occupier emphasized that listening to banned radio stations and conducting anti-occupation propaganda would undergo severe punishment. Police and security institutions used a network of associates and police commissioners on the field to prevent this phenomenon and reveal the offenders. Many cases were also discovered on the base of information collected from denunciations. After the investigation, some of the arrested were shot, while others were put into concentration camps or got lighter sentences, which proves that the repressive system did not have unified punishment maintenance. Parallel with police operations, the occupier acted preventively using propaganda. This way the regime intended to intimidate those who spread forbidden news. The need for the implementation of these acts of repression and propaganda is a good example that proves that a lot of people listened to forbidden radio stations and violated verbal delict.
Despite the fact that listening to forbidden radio stations and violating the verbal delict was not in correlation with the achievement of military forces goals of the Allies, this kind of unarmed and civil resistance in Belgrade was of great importance. Firstly, we would like to emphasize its moral value. This kind of behavior represented the main defense against the intentions of the invader to crush fundamental values of a society, such as freedom of speech and the right to be informed. Anti-occupation rhetoric speeches compromised the regime and had negative influence on the tendency of the occupier to get the support of the domestic population by use of propaganda, which was one of preconditions for pacification and the exploitation of the occupied territory. Spontaneous spreading of news criticizing the occupier, accented victories of the Allies and defeats of the Wehrmacht were an equally important factor for the affirmation of organized resistance among the domestic population. Undoubtedly the listening of this news could influence the citizens of Belgrade to „run to the woods“ and participate in organizations or support resistance movements as their sympathizers.
KEYWORDS: World War II, Belgrade, Propaganda, Censorship, Verbal Delict, Radio London, Repression, Civil Resistance
REFERENCES:
- Aleksić, Dragan. „Površina i broj stanovnika na području vojnoupravnog komandanta Srbije“. Tokovi istorije, br. 4, (1999), 144–150.
- Begović, Sima. Logor Banjica 1941–1944. I, II. Beograd: Institut za savremenu istoriju, 1989.
- Božović, Branislav. Specijalna policija u Beogradu 1941–1944. Beograd: Prosveta, 2003.
- Brayant, Chad. “The Language of Resistance Czech Jokes and Joke-telling under Nazi Ocuppation, 1943–1945”. Jurnal of Contemporary History, vol 41, (1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009406058687
- Čulinović, Ferdo. Okupatorska podjela Jugoslavije. Beograd: Vojnoizdavački zavod, 1970.
- Dimitrijević, Bojan. „General SS i policije August Majsner i srpski sistem bezbednosti 1942–1943“. Istorija 20. veka, br. 3, (2010), 69–83.
- Jevtović, Miroljub. Šta kaže Radio London. Beograd: A-Š delo, 1989.
- Kallis, Aristotel A. Nazi Propaganda and the Second World War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511101
- Kolaboracionistička štampa u Srbiji 1941–1944. Ur. Aleksandar Stojanović. Beograd: Filip Višnjić, 2015.
- Kolaboracionistička štampa u Srbiji 1941–1944. Ur. Aleksandar Stojanović. Beograd: Filip Višnjić, 2017.
- Koljanin, Milan. „Represija kao sistem – logori u okupiranoj Srbiji 1941–1945“. Hereticus, br. 1, (2007), 157–171.
- Koljanin, Milan. „Struktura i delovanje policije nacističke Nemačke u okupiranoj Srbiji 1941–1944“. Istorija 20. veka, br. 3, (2011), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.29362/ist20veka.2011.3.kol.143-156
- Koljanin, Milan. Nemački logor na beogradskom Sajmištu 1941–1944. Beograd: Institut za savremenu istoriju, 1992.
- Kreso, Muharem. Njemačka okupaciona uprava u Beogradu 1941–1944. Beograd: Istorijski arhiv Beograda, 1979.
- Lađević Gojko, i drugi. Beograd u ratu i revoluciji 1941–1945. Beograd: Istorijski arhiv Beograda, 1984.
- Logor Banjica: Logoraši, knjige zatočenika Koncentracionog logora Beograd-Banjica 1941–1944, I–II. Prir. Evica Micković i drugi. Beograd: Istorijski arhiv Beograda, 2009.
- Michel, Henri. The Shadow War: European Resistance 1939–1945. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.
- Mraović Marijana, „Propaganda vlade Milana Nedića (1941–1944)“. Doktorska disertacija, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za istoriju, 2015.
- Nemačka obaveštajna služba, IV. Beograd: Državni sekretarijat za unutrašnje poslove, 1959.
- Nikolić, Mirjana. Sender Belgrad Okupacijski Radio Beograd Zender Belgrad: Radiofonija u Srbiji tokom Drugog svetskog rata. Beograd: Radio Beograd, 2009.
- Ranković, Dragoljub J. Svakodnevni život pod okupacijom. Iskustvo jednog Beograđanina 1941–1944. Nataša Milićević, Dušan Nikodijević. Beograd: Institut za noviju istoriju Srbije, 2011.
- Ristanović, Rade. „Svakodnevica prvih meseci okupacije u člancima Beogradskih opštinskih novina“. Istorija 20. veka, br. 2, (2014), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.29362/ist20veka.2014.1.ris.95-110
- Ristanović, Rade. „Oblici otpora u okupiranom Beogradu 1941–1944“. Doktorska disertacija, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za istoriju, 2019.
- Ristović, Milan. Nemački novi poredak i Jugoistočna Evropa: 1940/41–1944/45: planovi o budućnosti i praksi. Beograd: Vojnoizdavački i novinski centar, 1991.
- Stargardt, Nicholas. The German War: A Nation under Arms. London: Penguin Random House, 2015.
- Stefanidis, Ioannis. Substitute for Power: Wartime British Propaganda to the Balkans. 1939–44. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2012.
- Stenton, Michael. Radio London and Resistance in Occupied Europe: British Political Warfare 1939–1943. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198208433.001.0001
- Stokker, Cathleen. Folklore Fights the Nazis: Humor in Occupied Norway 1940–1945. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1997.
- Terzić, Milan. „Delatnost radio stanice „Karađorđe“ u Jerusalimu“. Zbornik Matice srpske za istoriju, br. 88, (2013), 57–71.
- Vlahović, Veljko. Borba za slobodnu Jugoslaviju. Beograd–Titograd: Komunist–Pobjeda, 1981.
- Vojinović, Aleksandar. NDH u Beogradu. Zagreb: Naklada Pavičić, 1995.
- Welch, David. The Third Reich: Politics and Propaganda. London: Routledge, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930144
- Zec, Dejan. „Svakodnevni život u okupiranom Beogradu (1941–1944)“. Doktorska disertacija, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za istoriju, 2019.